I'm briefly back in the UK and got a game in with my long-suffering friend, Steve. We played Laserburn. It was a simple set-up of two groups of 'archaeologists' fighting to take the dig site, so that they could loot excavate it. We both had 5 figures, one of which was our leader and personal figure plus a unit of four followers. The terrain was a jungle with a ruined temple in the middle and the battlefield was 2' x 2'. The temple was the objective. There was nothing subtle about the scenario. We just had to fight until one side or the other retreated. I was too busy enjoying the game to take pictures, so this is not really a battle report in the usual format. Fortunately, I have photos of two of the figures used to help keep you engaged.
Dalia |
At this point, both sides were shaken. Steve had two figures that were knocked out and one dead. My leader and Turtle were dead. My remaining regular, Shades, took up the mantle of command, succeeding by only a very narrow margin. This brought my troops back from shaken status, meaning we could advance on the objective again. Steve dealt with that by having his leader shoot Dalia. As seems to be traditional in Laserburn, she was shot in every single appendage before the kill shot took her out. We were returned to shaken status. At this point, one of Steve's knocked out troops came to, lifting his force back from shaken status. Shades immediately avenged Dalia by planting a bullet in Steve's leader's heart and returning his force to shaken status. With neither force now able to advance, we called the game. Steve's force was closer to the temple so it was a victory for him, especially because he still had one figure that could come back round, admittedly with many wounded appendages because it had been lying in the open so my troops had spent every spare moment they had shooting at it and failing to kill it.
This was a great fun game that reminded me why I like Laserburn so much. Yes, there is a long list of modifiers for your to hit rolls. Yes, there is maths with the modifier for range being the actual range multiplied by a weapon-dependent multiplier. Yes, you roll to hit, then for hit location, then for penetration, then for damge. I know some people do not like this level of detail. None of these things bother me. It's not like the maths is particularly hard. The modifiers make sense and you quickly get used to the ones that apply to the circumstances of your game. The level of detail on the hit and damage is great, because it builds a narrative in your imagination, and it's the right level of crunchy for the size of game we play. And this game is just loaded with nostalgia for me. I've played it off and on for around 40 years now and I fully intend to take it into the care home with me. After all, the mental arithmetic involved will help keep my brain active into my dotage.
Nowadays' rules make easier to hit a target ;-)
ReplyDeleteI love Laserburn but just for nostalgia's sake as today I find it unnecesary complicated and slow , but I'd love to see your game, a shame you didn't take pictures of it1 Cheers
Sorry about the lack of photographs.
DeleteYes, newer rules do make it easier, and you don't have to track ammunition and jetpack fuel!
Obviously, different people want different things from their games, so there is a market for simpler rules. I can totally see why you would find it unnecessarily complicated, and I would not want to play Laserburn with more than 10-12 figures per side. There is too much to keep track of. Laserburn feels more like an rpg in its game play in that way. That is also its charm for me, and I have plenty of rules that will accommodate larger numbers of figures.
If there is one thing that I would change, it would be the way the action system is described. Instead of describing actions in 1/3 of a turn, I would give each figure 3 actions, and I would describe it in those turns. I would also make things like reloading into whole actions, rather than having a list that includes eject magazine, take out new magazine, load magazine, etc. But this is a minor issue as far as I am concerned.
Those things you would change are the ones I'm talking about, but I can understand why you keep playing Laserburn. Actually, what I'm doing now is playing Laserburn but with simpler rules. Here's one scenario I played recently: http://javieratwar.blogspot.com/2023/02/encounter-at-spaghettis-junction.html
ReplyDeleteCheers,
That is a fun report and is a scenario I am thinking of playing in a future Laserburn game. I had read your report before but cannot comment on your posts for some reason. Not sure why.
DeleteThe issues I mention are not big enough issues that I would change the game. I might write up a list of actions that just expresses things differently at some point though. It would be a useful reference sheet for Steve and me.